Legal Opinion

Oneida County v. Bangstad, Kirk

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 21, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00520Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONEIDA COUNTY, Plaintiff, v. OPINION and ORDER KIRK BANGSTAD and MINOCQUA BREWING 25-cv-520-jdp COMPANY LLC, Defendants. Kirk Bangstad and Minocqua Brewing Company removed this case from state court, relying on

28 U.S.C. § 1331

as the basis for jurisdiction. That statute applies to “all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” Oneida County’s complaint asserts claims under state law only, so the court directed defendants to show cause why the case should not be remanded to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API