Legal Opinion

Marchant v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1924PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrNER, J.

In a condemnation proceeding by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, the Port Development Commission, and the Public Improvement Commission of that city, the appellants were awarded $64,120 for approximately five and three-quarters acres of land, with appurtenant riparian rights, situated on the southwest shore of the Patapsoo River within the city limits. The land was condemned for the purposes of a comprehensive plan of harbor development for which provision has been made by the general assembly.

The first of the questions to be considered is whether this proceeding for the condemnation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. City of Frostburg v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Lerch v. Maryland Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API