Legal Opinion

Muchhala v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 6, 2007No. 2:05-cv-00863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

On May 9, 2004, Jay David Muchhala, a twenty-seven year old man, climbed a high voltage power pole in Yosemite National Park (‘Yosemite”). He was electrocuted and died, either as a result of the electrocution or from the resulting fall. Plaintiffs, Jay Muchhala’s parents, filed suit against the United States of America, which owns and operates the Park as well as the high voltage electric pole at which the accident occurred. Brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., the complaint…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sport Collectors Guild Incorporated v. United States Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. Sport Collectors Guild Incorporated v. United States Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API