Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lack v. Lack

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1979No. 19644Published

1DissentRobertson, Justice

I respectfully dissent for two reasons. First, the majority opinion, in refusing to hold that the death benefits are community property, ignores the rule of community property law that spouses share in property earned during marriage. Second, the majority’s reliance on City of Dallas v. Trammell, 129 Tex. 150, 101 S.W.2d 1009 (1937), is misplaced and does not support its holding.

The majority opinion is confusing because it does not classify the death benefits according to traditional notions of community property law. Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 5.01 (Vernon 1975) states that property must either be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lee v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Collida v. CollidaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API