Stainbrook v. Meskill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error From County Court, Creek County; Vick S. Decker, Judge. Action by Mike Meskill against Frank Stainbrook. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This is an appeal by plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled defendant, from the xefusal of the county court of Creek county to set aside and vacate a judgment in the sum of $175, rendered against him by default in favor of defendant in error, 'hereinafter called plaintiff, upon the grounds: (1) That defendant was prevented from appearing and defending said action by unavoidable casualty and misfortune; that he was ill and confined to his bed on the day said judgment was rendered; (2)' that his attorney was sick and unable to attend court and appear for him on said date;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wynn v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Williams v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Boyd v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stephenson v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kaylor v. Callahan Zinc-Lead Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Givens v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926