Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1902No. 1; Appeal, No. 297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 297, Jan. T., 1901, by defendant, from decree of C. P. McKean Co., Feb. T., 1897, No. 8, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in case of Ellen C. Hanna and William N. Hanna v. Junius R. Clark et al. Bill in equity for an account and for partition. Exceptions to report of J. M. McCluee, Esq., auditor to state account. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb,. Justice Potteb,

In the case of Hanna v. Clark, 189 Pa. 321, this court affirmed the court of common pleas of McKean county in its finding, that Junius R. Clark was a trustee for the benefit of the heirs of Joseph F. Clark, and that he should file an account as such, and that partition should be made of the real estate. In response to that order, the account of Junius R. Clark as trustee of the trust estate was filed in the court of common pleas of McKean county, and was referred to an auditor. From the confirmation of his report, this appeal is taken.

Numerous specifications of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanna v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Harris v. SilvisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Royer v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Pryor's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Gilbert v. TullmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API