Legal Opinion

DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 25, 2007No. 06-027PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Insurer, Lloyd’s of London, appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to its insured, Desiree DeBartolo. Insurer argues that the superior court erred: (1) in concluding that the policy it issued to insured provided coverage for damage to a restaurant property she owned, and (2) in finding that insured did not deliberately conceal that she had reopened the restaurant before the loss. We affirm.

¶2. The facts, which were largely stipulated below, may be briefly summarized. Ms. DeBartolo owned a restaurant property in Poultney, Vermont. She closed the restaurant in the fall of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Evergreen National Indemnity Co v. Tan It All, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Bookstaver v. Town of WestminsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeBartolo v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API