Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1952No. 17875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. “An alimony decree of a sister State, providing for future monthly payments, is such a decree as is enforceable in this State, under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States, as to such payments as have become due and are unpaid at the time of a judgment thereon in this State. Roberts v. Roberts, 174 Ga. 645 (163 S. E. 735); Cureton v. Cureton, 132 Ga. 745, 751 (65 S. E. 65); Heakes v. Heakes, 157 Ga. 863, 867 (122 S. E. 777); McLendon v. McLendon, 66 Ga. App. 156, 159 (17 S. E. 2d, 252). But the fact that such a decree of another State was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heakes v. HeakesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Cureton v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. McLendon v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. McLendon v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Connell v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Napier v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Matuszczak v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Tobin v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API