Legal Opinion

Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. Bowman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1968No. [No. 214, September Term, 1967.] [No. 297, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

September Term, 1967.]

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The question presented by these appeals concerns the maximum amount recoverable from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund on judgments obtained after April 1, 1965 for damages arising out of motor vehicle accidents occurring prior to that date.

Chapter 81 of the Laws of 1964, effective April 1, 1965, repealed and reenacted with amendments §§ 119(3) (a), 122, 134(b), 162(a) and 172 of Article 66j^ (1967 Repl. Vol.) so as to increase the mandatory minimum amounts of financial responsibility required for bodily injuries or death under the motor vehicle laws and to make corresponding changes in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Janda v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Thomas v. Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. State Tax Commission v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Cumberland Operating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. State of Maryland, Dept. of N. Res. v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  5. Prince George's Cty. v. Mayor and City of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API