Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ford Motor Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 6, 2016No. 2014-1581Published

1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge

I find no principled explanation for Customs’ decision in this case to treat duty refund claims under NAFTA differently depending on whether those claims were filed traditionally or through an electronic process known as “reconciliation.” I dissent.

BACKGROUND

The fundamental purpose of NAFTA is to provide preferential trade treatment to goods and services that originate within the NAFTA region. Central to NAFTA’s purpose is the “certificate of origin.” The certificate of origin is a document certifying that goods originate in the NAFTA region and hence qualify for preferential tariff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API