Legal Opinion

State v. Tartaglia

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1969No. 376PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Convicted of burglary, defendant appeals. He had been determined to be mentally incompetent to stand trial. The dis-positive issue concerns a “redetermination” of mental competency to stand trial.

The applicable portion of § 41-13-3.1, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp. 1969) reads:

“* * * When the determination is made that a defendant does not have mental capacity to stand trial, the court shall commit him to the New Mexico state hospital until such time as the court finds him to have mental capacity to stand trial. Defendants committed under this section shall be treated as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. HoveyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. GuyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. HollowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. HollowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Doe, IIINew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. BarefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API