Legal Opinion

Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 20, 2019No. 17-2429PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rovner, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 - 60, was enacted more than a hundred years ago to compensate railroad employees for injuries they receive on the job. Ruark was an employee of the Union Pacific Railroad when a hydraulic rail drill malfunctioned and sprayed him with hot oil. He sought relief under FELA using the legal doctrine of "res ipsa loquitur," a doctrine that asks a finder of fact to infer liability when (as the Latin is often translated) "the thing speaks for itself." Because of the burden-shifting nature of the doctrine, it requires…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Surgery Ctr. At 900 N. Mich. Ave., LLC v. Am. Physicians Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Cottle v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
  3. Crayton v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  4. Crivilare v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
  5. Dennis Mikel v. Megan MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API