Danny Ruark v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Rovner, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 - 60, was enacted more than a hundred years ago to compensate railroad employees for injuries they receive on the job. Ruark was an employee of the Union Pacific Railroad when a hydraulic rail drill malfunctioned and sprayed him with hot oil. He sought relief under FELA using the legal doctrine of "res ipsa loquitur," a doctrine that asks a finder of fact to infer liability when (as the Latin is often translated) "the thing speaks for itself." Because of the burden-shifting nature of the doctrine, it requires…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Surgery Ctr. At 900 N. Mich. Ave., LLC v. Am. Physicians Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Cottle v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Crayton v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Crivilare v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
- Dennis Mikel v. Megan MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.