Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hickey v. Levitan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1926PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The statute is a regulatory measure and applies to wholesale, produce dealers, and within the purview of the definition of one engaged in this business are included not only the wholesaler who buys and sells on his own account, but also an agent who sells produce for consignors on commission. The statute thus creates two classes of produce dealers, — the one the wholesaler, the other the retailer; the former selling to others than consumers, the latter disposing of his produce to the consumer. This act attempts to regulate the business of the wholesaler, and in nowise affects the retailer,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Southwestern Oil Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. Fred G. AmickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. PerrettaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API