Legal Opinion

Watland v. L. E. Whitham Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1924No. 2304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

L. E. Whitham & Co. sued A. R. and O. T. Watland, to recover on a paving certificate issued by the city of Wichita Palls. On trial without a jury personal judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs against said defendants, with foreclosure of lien on the property hereinafter described.

Three principal questions are presented on the appeal: (1) Whether the description of the property as contained in the paving certificate and as followed in the petition and judgment is void for uncertainty.(2) Whether there was error in striking out defendant’s answer and cross-action which alleged that—

“the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eustis v. City of HenriettaTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Converse v. LangshawTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Slaughter v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Corsicana v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Jones v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herring v. City of MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. West Texas Const. Co. v. DossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. City of Tulsa v. HindmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Doss v. West Texas Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wood v. Phoenix-Tempe Stone Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API