Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Recommendation of the Board of Bar Examiners for the Conditional Admission of Ogilvie

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2001No. 21757Published

1DissentGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 55.] Based on a de novo review of this record, I would hold that Ogilvie has failed by clear and convincing evidence to establish that he possesses the “good moral character” to gain admission to the State Bar of South Dakota. As such, I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the Court.

[¶ 56.] An essential beginning of an examination of this question is to once again re-affirm the basis upon which an attorney is allowed to enter and remain in this professional calling. For nearly as long as there has been a South Dakota, those wishing to engage here in the practice of law have taken the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Matter of Discipline of JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Application of WiddisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API