Legal Opinion

Javier Antonio Gonzales v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 25, 2020No. 8:19-cv-02341Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAVIER A. G.,1 Case No. SACV 19-2341 PVC 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Javier A. G. (“Plaintiff”) appeals from the final decision of the Commissioner of 19 Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Agency”) denying his application for Disability 20 Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to the 21 jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 12-14). On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API