Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Boyette

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2003No. S032736Published

1DissentKennard, J.

I dissent.

During jury selection in this death penalty case, the defense objected to the prosecution’s exercise of peremptory challenges against four African-American women, asserting that the challenges were purposefully discriminatory on the basis of the prospective jurors’ race and gender. The trial court said it did not think a prima facie case had been shown and asked the prosecutor if she wanted to explain her challenges. The prosecutor responded she had challenged these prospective jurors because she thought they could not vote for the death penalty. The trial court then ruled on the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API