Legal Opinion
ETEAM, INC. v. SVS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 16, 2021No. 2:19-cv-18600Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ETEAM INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-18600 (SDW) (LDW) v. OPINION SVS TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Defendant. June 16, 2021 WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court is Plaintiff eTeam Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1) and 1332(a)(2). Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This opinion is issued without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78. For the reasons stated herein,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.