Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Murnan Shipbuilding Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1924No. 1 Div. 283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiffs as riparian proprietors seek to recover of the defendant the statutory charge of 5 cents a day for each log or stick of timber of the defendant fastened to certain piles alleged to have been maintained by the plaintiffs in front of their property situated on the banks of the Mobile river.

The suit is brought under the provisions of section 4S18 of the Code of 1907. The demurrer to the complaint as originally framed and subsequently amended having been sustained, plaintiffs took a nonsuit and appeal.

Counts 1 and 2 as last amended and counts A and B, added by amendment, disclose that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Turner v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Alabama Great Southern Ry. Co. v. CardwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Blanchard-Hamilton Furniture Co. v. ColvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Coral Gables, Inc. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. Chamberlain v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. People Ex Rel. White v. StormIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API