Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Estate of Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2007No. 06-PR-435Published

1ConcurrenceReid, Associate Judge

I fully agree with Judge Farrell’s opinion for the court. While I respect Judge Thompson’s dissent, I cannot agree with her view that “the result the majority reaches today is unfair to [Ms.] Smith.” Beginning on June 8, 2004, when Mr. Homer Brown filed pleadings opposing the sale of the property in question and objecting to the Personal Representative’s request for compensation for Ms. Smith, she clearly was on notice of her alleged conflict of interest due to her representation of the Personal Representative and her role as sole owner of the company responsible for the real estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Richardson v. GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re Estate of GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In Re Estate of HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API