Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Radventures, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 13, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-40212-NMGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
On the basis of diversity jurisdiction, the plaintiff, Paul Edwards (“Edwards”) filed suit in federal court against defendants Radventures, Inc. (“Radventures”) and Work Performance Products, Inc. (“WPP”) for personal injuries arising out of Edwards’ use of a product called the “Yetti Racer” monoski. The Yetti Racer mono-ski is allegedly manufactured by Radven-tures and contains “sub-component parts and sub-assemblies of [WPP]”. Edwards is a member of the United States Disabled ski team and was injured while using the monoski. Edwards asserts state law…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Access Now, Inc. v. Otter Products, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Tabb v. JOURNEY FREIGHT INTERNATIONSDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- CRG Financial, LLC v. Two Diamond Capital CorpDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Kingston v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.