Phillips v. Phillips
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentGonzalez, Justice
Despite the clear language of Tex. R.Civ.P. 94 and the collective wisdom of every court of appeals of this state that has considered the issue, the majority holds that a defendant need not affirmatively plead the defense of “penalty” in a contract action. This holding resurrects trial by ambush and rejects the notion that parties are entitled to know what theories of law they will face at trial. I would hold that by failing to plead it, Mr. Phillips waived his right to assert that the contract he entered into with his wife is unenforceable. Furthermore, since Mr. Phillips waived the penalty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Gorman v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Bethel v. Butler Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Lewkowicz v. El Paso Apparel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.