Legal Opinion

Perry v. HEIRS AT LAW & DISTRIB. OF GADSDEN

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1993No. 2080Published

1Opinion of the Court

437 S.E.2d 174 (1993)

Alice A.G.G. PERRY, Emily Mitchell, Eliza Tremble, and Doris Green, Respondents,

v.

HEIRS AT LAW AND DISTRIBUTEES OF Charles GADSDEN, C.H. Gadsden, C.S. Gadsden, Louise Gadsden, Cain Gadsden, John Gadsden, Lula Nelson, Louis Gadsden, Herman Gadsden, Carrie Gadsden, Estella Gadsden, Mattie Gadsden, United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., Hazel Point Partnership, Luther Major, Martha Major, Queenie Taylor, Dolly Fripp, Beaufort-Jasper Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.; also, the following persons believed to…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Culler v. Blue Ridge Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. O'Shea v. LesserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API