Legal Opinion

Quick v. EMCO Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided April 29, 2008No. 4:07-cv-00579-JEG-TJSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES E. GRITZNER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the consolidated motions of Plaintiff David Quick (Quick) to dismiss his claim under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and to remand his case to state court (Clerk’s No. 2). Defendants EMCO Enterprises, Inc., and Andersen Corporation (Defendants) resist Quick’s motions. The parties have not requested a hearing, and the Court finds no hearing is necessary for the resolution of these motions. The matter is fully submitted and ready for disposition.

*373I. BACKGROUND

On August 30, 2006, Quick filed his Petition against the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Jeffrey Barstad v. Murray CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Jeno F. Paulucci and Lois Paulucci v. City of Duluth and Lake Superior Paper IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rita Lindsey v. Dillard's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kensu v. Corizon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API