Legal Opinion

Marks v. Kindel

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1930No. 5506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This ease was decided below on the sufficiency of the declaration as to all defendants except J. Keith Muir. There are three counts in the declaration. The first declares upon a purchase-money note for Florida lands; the second seeks to recover the unpaid purchase price “of certain lands in Orange County, Florida,” irrespective of a note; and the third is a common count for money and property had and received. In response to a motion therefor, plaintiffs filed a bill of particulars under the common count stating that it was for the balance due on lands in Orange county,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Anderson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
  5. Lipman v. MangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward Mahalsky and Paul Logue v. The Salem Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. Carroll W. Britton, W. R. Britton and Fred Ballou v. Ronald E. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API