Legal Opinion
HOECHST CELANESE v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 2000No. C030702PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
90 Cal.Rptr.2d 768 (1999)
76 Cal.App.4th 914
HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.
No. C030702.
Court of Appeal, Third District.
December 3, 1999.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 3, 2000.
Review Granted March 1, 2000.
Morrison & Foerster, Eric J. Coffill and Lisa R. Brenner, Sacramento, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Lawrence K. Keethe, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and George C. Spanos, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.
Paull Mines and Anne E. Miller for Multistate Tax…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Texaco-Cities Service Pipeline Co. v. McGawIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Lenox, Inc. v. OffermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Lenox, Inc. v. OffermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000