Legal Opinion

Harold C. Ostrosky v. State of Alaska Roger v. Endell, Commissioner of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1990No. 89-35173PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

The State of Alaska and Roger V. Endell, Commissioner of Corrections, appeal the district court’s grant of Harold Ostrosky’s writ of habeas corpus. The district court held that the State of Alaska denied Ostro-sky his right to due process under the fourteenth amendment because he had a right to rely on a prior Alaska superior court decision declaring the statute under which he was convicted unconstitutional, although the decision was pending on appeal before the Alaska Supreme Court. The district court did not rule on Ostro-sky’s other contention, that he has a right…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. John C. Mandanici, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. People v. BeachemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. United States v. German Valentin RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. EkwunohDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API