Legal Opinion

People v. Mojica-Simental

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 21, 2003No. 02SC44PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

I. Introduction

We granted certiorari in this case to consider two issues: first, whether section 16-8-309(5), 6 C.R.S. (2002), which allows eriminal-istics laboratory reports to be admitted without the testimony of the lab technician, applies in a driving under the influence (DUI) case; and second, whether section 16-8-309(5) is constitutional. We determine that section 16-3-309(5) does apply in a DUI case and is constitutional on its face.

At the commencement of the jury trial, the county court ruled that blood test results would not be admitted without the testimony of a lab technician under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. West v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People v. Hinojos-MendozaColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. BelvinSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. Cropper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API