Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. Denman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1933No. 24571. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon a promissory note. The cause came on for trial before the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof to sustain a recovery and moved for a dismissal. This motion was sustained, and from the judgment dismissing the action the plaintiff appeals.

The facts which will present the controlling question may be summarized as follows: April 15, 1931, Peter Sandberg died, leaving a last will and testament in which, after minor bequests, he devised and bequeathed everything to his daughter, Esther…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Montreal v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Germania Bank v. MichaudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API