Legal Opinion

Bank of Montreal v. Buchanan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1903No. 4612PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, San Juan County., — Men, Gteobge- A. Joined, Judge;

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

The. appellant brought this suit and alleged that on November 25, 1890, James A. Buchanan and Mary E. Buchanan, his wife, were indebted to E. Bennett & Son in the sum of $1,680, and that as evidence of such indebtedness the said James A. Buchanan executed and delivered to said E. Bennett & Son three promissory notes, each for $560, maturing respectively on the 1st day of May in the years 1892, 1893, and 1894, which notes were afterwards transferred to appellant; that on or about June 22, 1892, said Mary E. Buchanan died, leaving a last will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lawrence v. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Baumgartner v. MoffattWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dern v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API