State v. Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
In their first two arguments on appeal, defendants contend the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony by Dr. Joseph Scott. Defendants sought to have Dr. Scott testify as to 1) the proper community standard for obscenity in Mecklenburg County and 2) the community acceptance of other sexually explicit materials “comparable” to those which defendants were convicted of disseminating. Defendants correctly point out that “appropriate expert testimony” may be offered “to explain to juries what they otherwise would not understand” in an obscenity case. State v. Anderson,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002