Doe ex rel. Doe v. Public Health Trust
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Concurrence
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring.
It overlooks reality to say, as the majority does, that a child admitted to a hospital by a parent is a voluntary patient and under the law, should be treated more like an adult voluntary patient than an adult involuntary patient. To hold, as the majority does, that the parents of a child have the right to seek medical treatment for the child and protect the child’s interests without any knowledge or first hand observation of the treatment’s progress is folly. Thus, while I agree to the reversal and remand of this case, I write separately to point…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.