Legal Opinion

Falk v. Falk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1934No. 31,387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action f-or a divorce. The plaintiff appeals, claiming the trial court committed error in the allowance of alimony.

There was evidence to the following effect: Prior to the marriage defendant had a Star automobile. He traded it for a used Durant automobile. In the trade the old car was valued at $400, and plaintiff, from her own means, paid $720. At the time of the marriage on December 2, 1929, defendant owned two lots, on which there is a small house. The property is assessed for taxation at $1,200, but its value is not shown. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Metcalf v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Imhoff v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Leiter v. LeiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Wittig v. WittigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API