Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard H. Strange, United States of America v. Charles A. Zamorano
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 13, 1996No. 96-1244, 96-1634PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Richard Strange and Charles Zamorano pleaded guilty to violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994), by conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances. Strange and Zamora-no appeal the sentences imposed by the district court, 1 and we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In February of 1993, Strange, a drug dealer, told his friend and customer Robert Scott that he had located a connection for guaranteed quantities of marijuana, and in subsequent conversations Strange disclosed that Zamorano was his supplier. A few months later, Strange…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Kevin TownleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Bruce Wayne AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Francisco Corral-Ibarra and Roberto HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Luis Humberto BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States of America,appellee v. Luis Navarrete-Barron, A/k/aluis Navarrete,appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Shawn SerfassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Susan DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ira Jerome MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.