Legal Opinion
State v. Graf
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1993No. CC 900633472, 900633473, 900633474; CA A69280; SC S39638PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
Defendant, a former employee of the Oregon Department of Transportation (the department), was charged with crimes that allegedly occurred during his employment with the department. He asserts that the department coerced him into testifying at a pre-termination hearing and that he therefore is entitled to transactional immunity and dismissal of some of the criminal charges. The trial court agreed and dismissed two of the charges. The Court of Appeals reversed. State v. Graf, 114 Or App 275, 835 P2d 934 (1992). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, but on different grounds.
Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. SorianoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oatney v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BeugliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Sawyer v. Real Estate AgencyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SchwinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997