Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 21, 2024No. 4:24-cv-00996Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANNY MARSHALL, Case No. 24-cv-00996-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 10 ALAMEDA CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 8, 9 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Alameda Contra Costa Transit (“AC Transit”), Amalgamated Transit 14 Union Local 192 (“ATU Local 192”), and Robert Coleman’s motions to dismiss. ECF Nos. 8, 9. 15 The Court will grant the motions in part and deny them in part. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff Danny Marshall is an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.