Legal Opinion

Angelica Limcaco v. Steve Wynn

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 29, 2021No. 2:20-cv-11372Unknown

1Opinion

Jo-d9 □□ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 | ANGELICA LIMCACO, RowecMehe IS Plaintiff, ORDER re: Defendants’ 14 v. Motions to Dismiss First 15 | STEVE WYNN, et al., él ol. top [S7, 98, 16 Defendants. 18 Currently before the Court are five motions to 19] dismiss Plaintiff Angelica Limcaco’s (“Plaintiff” or 20 | “Limcaco”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by 21] Defendants Wynn Resorts, Ltd. (“Wynn Resorts”) and 22 | Matthew Maddox (“Maddox”) [57], Defendant Steve Wynn 23} (“Wynn”) [58], Defendant Kimmarie Sinatra (“Sinatra”) 24 [61],…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API