Legal Opinion

Western Maryland Railway Co. v. Continental Grain Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 26, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, Western Maryland Railway Co., against eleven defendants to collect *127storage and detention charges allegedly due and owing. Defendant Bunge Corporation, named as defendant in the third count of the complaint, now moves for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Counsel have agreed that there is no genuine issue of material fact. And indeed after an independent examination of the moving papers the court finds that resort to the summary judgment procedure is appropriate as sole question for adjudication is one of law,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API