Legal Opinion
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1973No. 73-1228PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company (hereinafter CBQ) brought this action against Ready Mixed Concrete Co. (hereinafter Concrete Co.) for unpaid switching charges pursuant to a tariff which had been approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter ICC). The switching charges in question were for the period of April, 1965, to November, 1966. The total switching charges pursuant to the tariff amounted to $21,467.91. The sum of $9,226.23 was paid to CBQ by the *1265Concrete Co. on February 2, 1967,1 pursuant to an agreement between CBQ and the Concrete Co.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holly Shipp v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Brookfield Production Credit Ass'n v. BorronDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
- McGowan v. Ries (In Re McGowan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Paulson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Rutledge Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.