Henry Harris v. Margaret Blake, Ellis Copeland, Michael J. Gimmestad, and the Board of Trustees of the University of Northern Colorado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Henry Harris brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), alleging that his rights to procedural and substantive due process were violated when he was required to withdraw from a program of graduate study. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants. We affirm.,
I
Summary judgment is inappropriate unless there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Clark v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 731 F.2d 698, 700 (10th Cir.1984); Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Union…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard LamunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gossett v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Board of Regents for Langston UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Setliff v. Memorial Hospital of Sheridan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.