Legal Opinion
Armour v. Village of Litchfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1922No. 22,965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Under the power granted by chapter 65, p. 62, Laws 1919, the village council of Litchfield paved one of the streets in the village. After the contract was let, the work done, and the assessment for benefits spread by the engineer and village clerk, notice was duly given of a hearing on such assessment. Respondent filed written objections to the confirmation. It was confirmed by the village council. He appealed to the district court. The appeal was heard upon the objections filed and the answer of the village thereto that the assessment was made on the basis of benefits to the property without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & ExpensesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Elkhorn Valley Lodge No. 57, I. O. O. F. v. HudsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Assessment for Widening East Fourth Street in St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- In Re Assessment for Paving Mississippi River BoulevardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- In Re Appeal of MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929