Legal Opinion

Leahy v. Stone

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 12, 1904No. Gen. No. 10,349PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

The contention of the plaintiff in error is, that notwithstanding the stipulation that this judgment should be final and that no appeal or writ of error should be prosecuted to reverse the same by either party, this writ of error- can be sustained because the stipulation was signed, not by the defendant, but by his attorneys for him, and that attorneys have no implied authority to make such a stipulation.

The certified check of' the defendant was deposited with the clerk in pursuance of the terms of the stipulation. The judgment was vacated and the defendant took part in the second trial and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SpringIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Farwell v. SturgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Meriden Hydro-Carbon Arc Light Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Terre Haute Brewing Co. v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Fowlkes v. IngrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Hill Construction Co. ex rel. Reddy Roofing Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API