Legal Opinion

Pipkin v. Tuer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1915No. 5488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

Appellees, heirs of William Tuer, deceased, instituted suit ón a promissory note for $600, executed by C. P. Stevens and William L. Douglass to William Tuer, against C. P. Stevens, Stephen W. Pipkin, independent executor of the will of W. L. Douglass, deceased, and Sam Cameron and Mrs. Mattie Davis, the only devisees of said Douglass. Appellants answered that W. L. Douglass was merely a surety on the note of which C. P. Stevens was the maker; that the note had been extended by William Tuer and Stevens without the ’ knowledge or consent of Douglass. They prayed for judgment over against C. P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Church v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Miller v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Alexander v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bunker v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Webb v. Willett Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API