Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilbert v. Federal Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 35,959Published

1Dissent

Julia Gilbert, plaintiff, beneficiary under an accident policy issued to Fred J. Stute, her brother, recovered a judgment on a directed verdict against the insurer, Federal Life Insurance Company, defendant. The policy was issued to Stute as a premium on a $2 subscription to the Michigan Farmer. The following clause of the policy is pertinent to the issue in the instant case:

"Part 3. Automobile and Specified Farm Machinery Accidents.
"(a) For loss of life, both hands or both feet, sight of both eyes or one hand and one foot, sight of one eye and one hand or sight of one eye and one foot…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kimbrough v. National Protective InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Sant v. Continental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Continental Life Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API