People v. Brooklyn Bank
New York Supreme Court
Motion by receiver to compel co-receivers to restore to estate commissions alleged to have been received by them in excess of amount authorized by law.
1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.
On or about November 16, 1907, upon the application of the Attorney-General of the State of New York based upon a report and complaint verified by the Superintendent of Banks of this State, Bruyn Hasbrouck was appointed temporary receiver of said defendant bank, with the usual powers and duties of such a receiver. He executed his bond and entered upon the execution of his trust, taking possession of the bank and its assets. On or about the 14th day of December, 1907, the said Bruyn Hasbrouck was made one of the permanent receivers of said bank, and Charles M. Higgins was associated with him…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Phoenix v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Nathan v. WhitlockNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Wagstaff v. LowerreNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Lawrence v. DaleNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- In re KelloggNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of CouttsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Arbitration between Arenstein & HustonNew York Supreme Court · 1988