Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Clarke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1954No. 311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The evidence, both record and parol, discloses that J. Thad Perkins made deeds to his children on 20 September, 1921, conveying the southern portion of his farm to his sons, Robert H., Samuel O., and Frank E. Perkins. The first call in the description of this deed is the line in controversy: “Beginning at the forks of Rocky Branch, William Carroll’s corner in the Micheaux line, running an easterly course to a mahogany tree on Wilson’s Creek.” This tract of land with the same calls was conveyed to the defendant, F. L. Clarke, on 19 January, 1946, by Robert H., Samuel O., and Frank E. Perkins.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southerland v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . WellmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Williams v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Maynard v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Pate v. Tar Heel Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smothers v. SchlosserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Maness v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API