Legal Opinion

C & W Manhattan Associates v. Lively

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1979No. 8291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAYTON, Justice.

This is a suit for the recovery of damages for breach of an option contract between appellee, Gordon R. Lively, and appellant, C & W Manhattan Associates. In a non-jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of appellee in the sum of $106,250, plus prejudgment interest.

In September 1972, appellee, Lively, obtained from George Kelly an option to purchase a certain tract of land for the purchase price of $300,000. On February 14, 1973, appellant, Manhattan Associates, entered into an agreement with Lively whereby Manhattan Associates were granted “the exclusive right and option…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. LillieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Ferguson v. Von SeggernCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Northside Lumber & Bldg. Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. McWhirter v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. State v. Wiergate Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tye v. AppersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Tye v. AppersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API