Legal Opinion
Schiavone Construction Co. v. Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 21, 1985PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case a moratorium on real estate development was imposed by defendant, Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (“HMDC”), for the purpose of completing studies to determine the feasibility of a food distribution center. The moratorium, covering about 550 acres of meadowlands, included approximately 115 acres of undeveloped land owned by plaintiffs, Schiavone Construction Co. and Schiavone North Bergen Realty, I, Inc. (“Schiavone”).
Schiavone challenged the moratorium in the Appellate Division on the grounds that the bar on development and construction effected an unconstitutional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Morris County Land Improvement Co. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Lomarch Corp. v. Mayor of EnglewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Cappture Realty Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. ELMWOOD PK.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rieder v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Littman v. GimelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Bernardsville Quarry, Inc. v. Borough of BernardsvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.