Blount v. State

Mikell, Judge.

Following the denial of his motion in limine, in which he sought to suppress the results of his breath test, Herbert V. Blount IV was convicted of violating OCGA § 40-6-391 (k). That statute prohibits a person under the age of 21 from driving while his alcohol concentration is 0.02 grams or more. On appeal, Blount contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine because the stop of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We disagree and affirm.

Three principles guide appellate review of the trial court’s denial of a motion to…