Legal Opinion
Consol. R. Corp. v. Nat. Rr Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 6, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 87-0510Published
1Opinion of the Court
657 F.Supp. 405 (1987)
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,
and
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Respondent.
Civ. A. No. 87-0510.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
April 6, 1987.
As Amended May 6, 1987.
Gerald P. Norton, Washington, D.C.; Laurence Z. Shiekman and Thomas E. Zemaitis, pro hac vice, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner Conrail.
Harold R. Henderson, Christopher M. Klein and John C. Morland, Washington, D.C., for respondent Amtrak; William R. Perlik, Deanne C. Siemer and Michael A. Mello, Washington, D.C., of counsel.
MEMO…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.